Some games (Nippon Ichi ones) tend to run full speed on 2Ghz and over, providing your processor is a dual core. Oni Lukos c t 19:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Reply Well with 2D games its a bit of a mixed bag. I'm leaving the disputed tag there for a little while until I can gather information about what's needed for 2D games, as I can't really run those either. Generally machines around the 3Ghz mark don't have much problem running FFX at full speed (i personally have a C2Q 3.4, but had a C2D at 3Ghz before and it ran full speed constantly) - Refraction Fair enough. I am one of the main developers of PCSX2, i have ammended the system requirements slightly to reflect a more accurate spec required to run Final Fantasy X at the stated speed. Oni Lukos c t 19:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Reply However, the article implies that it works on hardware from two years ago (it doesn't mention high end at all) at full speed, and seeing as I do have hardware that is above the minimum as stated in the article, I'm leaving the accuracy tag there until I can gather more information. I did some research, and apparently on very high end modern hardware, it will run at full speed. Oni Lukos c t 07:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC) Reply Certainly not the 60 FPS mentioned in this article. Fairly consistent 30 FPS during the opening menu, even with both cores maxed out. Might I add that the about page says ".you will still need the latest and most powerfull machine you can get your hands on to even break the 30 FPS mark." - Oni Lukos c t 07:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC) Reply ĭecided to try FFX now instead of waiting. I can try this out at a future date, but for now, I'm going to leave the accuracy template up. I have relatively modern hardware (2 years old), so if Disgaea's MENUS run like crap.I shudder to think about the speed of FFX, which is full 3D. I never even broke 40 FPS, even with dual core support enabled. I popped in my Disgaea disc and tried this emulator. The article at the time of posting this says that "Most 2D games and menus can reach 60-120 FPS, and with the latest version, in-game 3D performance on a relatively new desktop computer can reach speeds greater than the native PS2 frame rate of 60 FPS (NTSC) and 50 FPS (PAL)". I have a GeForce 8600GT M now, so I can try again, but that's still not as good as desktop GeForce 8600GT. It was, after all, a portable version of a mid/low-end GeForce 7 series, so it probably would not satisfy the requirements very well. Radeon HD 4000 series: As of now, only highend cards for this series have been release, so pcsx2 is child's play for these monsters -Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.168.24 ( talk) 08:22, 24 December 2008 (UTC) Reply Indeed, after the argument, I realized that my card wasn't as high-end as I thought. Geforce 200 series: As of now only highend cards for this series have been release, so pcsx2 is child's play for these monsters A few games will require more and some games less) Since every series (eg Geforce 6 series) has cards running the gamut from weak integrated lowend to immensely more powerful highend we should clarify the cutoff point for which cards in a particular series are ideal for the emulator.Īs it stands now these would include for Nvidia: (this is a general rule. Noticing the argument below between pcsx2 developer Refraction and Oni Lukos, it is also important to clarify that not only is a fast CPU important but also which videocards in a particular series (generation) are optimal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |